CO129-253 - Public Offices & Others - 1891 — Page 624

7

Lí

wik. C. B. and that the Secretary of state referred to in the Duke

Mambridge's

was

letter

of

Oct. 15th 1888 2.130f

come the Secretary of

State for War.

1.? So reply and

"send copy of Gen. Sargent's Ms. Cetter

t of an refle to W.O_ 2.7.

ша

2: ? Putty* qu9/5

or 2.

The 15h ausum suggested by Mr Johnom

is open to the objection

that it is only

an argumentation denial. If any

ausan at all is required, it Ormed te

a simple state month that had hundinud

did not säike his name int

f

thee List

Bout 3 do not binds that any

is required. He percions himself test

he has no

Evidence

or reason to suppinig

it was heed Kantipur. He has monly

asting at the anclusion by a proses If Exhaustion -8.2. as it hasn't the

the Mod brochure

x. Mr Priv Sec. has already ack ? rece

620

Duke of Cambridge it munch han time wand

Kuntoped. He might as well say

it was ich the Decke of (auchridge, it must

ist

handen the hand Mayee of

Putly 2 Cowr

amitin kans

achnownder)

5577

3.5.91

As it has been add it may be dangerous not tell min be in suting mistaker. Memine Whould roto for pitting in G.

QM MS There is

If he

5

The is really mold there is Noonanime to take any

gain.

anyuctio

I have read then new brochures"

they contain

some striking panges. On

the shoh Ishould in rispond to late the

Un Meade's P.S & pulty.

Few suppested

P. T. O

Reut may